Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador

Ecuador: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private was 22.4% in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
22.4%
Change on year
up 8.8%
World rank
5th
of 30 countries
All-time high
23.2%
in 2010
All-time low
19.8%
in 2008
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador, 2008–2022

05101520252008201520222008: 19.82010: 23.22011: 20.22012: 23.12014: 22.32015: 20.52016: 22.72017: 21.42018: 21.72019: 20.52020: 20.72021: 20.62022: 22.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Ecuador stood at 22.4%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.8% on the previous year and down 3.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Ecuador peaked at 23.2% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 19.8%, in 2008.

That places Ecuador 5th out of 30 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 19.8%
2010 23.2% +17.5%
2011 20.2% -12.8%
2012 23.1% +14.4%
2014 22.3% -3.6%
2015 20.5% -8.3%
2016 22.7% +10.9%
2017 21.4% -5.7%
2018 21.7% +1.3%
2019 20.5% -5.4%
2020 20.7% +1.1%
2021 20.6% -0.6%
2022 22.4% +8.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.8% 19.8% 19.8% 1
2010s 21.7% 20.2% 23.2% 9
2020s 21.2% 20.6% 22.4% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 2 Panama 24.1% compare
  2. 3 Republic of Moldova 23.6% compare
  3. 4 Paraguay 22.8% compare
  4. 6 Peru 22.1% compare
  5. 7 Colombia 22.0% compare
  6. 8 Honduras 22.0% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Ecuador?
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private in Ecuador was 22.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 23.2% in 2010.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 19.8% in 2008.
How does Ecuador rank for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private?
Ecuador ranks 5th out of 30 countries with data for 2022.
Is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-3rd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/ecuador/">Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population