Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus
Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 19.0% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 19.0% for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.9% on the previous year and down 10.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus peaked at 21.5% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 19.0%, in 2019.
That places Belarus 26th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 21.5% | — |
| 2009 | 21.2% | -1.5% |
| 2010 | 21.3% | +0.8% |
| 2012 | 20.0% | -6.1% |
| 2013 | 21.4% | +7.0% |
| 2014 | 21.5% | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 21.1% | -1.9% |
| 2016 | 21.0% | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 21.1% | +0.2% |
| 2018 | 20.0% | -5.2% |
| 2019 | 19.0% | -4.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.3% | 21.2% | 21.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 19.0% | 21.5% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 23 Kyrgyzstan 19.4% compare
- 24 Georgia 19.4% compare
- 25 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 19.3% compare
- 27 Türkiye 19.0% compare
- 28 Uruguay 18.1% compare
- 29 Kazakhstan 17.8% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus?
- Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus was 19.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 21.5% in 2014.
- What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 19.0% in 2019.
- How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 26th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population