Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 22.4% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
22.4%
Change on year
up 11.5%
World rank
17th
of 27 countries
All-time high
27.4%
in 2012
All-time low
20.1%
in 2018
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

01020302008201320192008: 22.32009: 21.12010: 22.42012: 27.42013: 21.12014: 24.32015: 23.12016: 24.42017: 24.22018: 20.12019: 22.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus stood at 22.4%.

That represents a change of up 11.5% on the previous year and up 6.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 27.4% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 20.1%, in 2018.

That places Belarus 17th out of 27 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 22.3%
2009 21.1% -5.1%
2010 22.4% +5.9%
2012 27.4% +22.6%
2013 21.1% -22.9%
2014 24.3% +15.1%
2015 23.1% -4.9%
2016 24.4% +5.6%
2017 24.2% -0.9%
2018 20.1% -17.0%
2019 22.4% +11.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 21.7% 21.1% 22.3% 2
2010s 23.3% 20.1% 27.4% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 14 Mongolia 22.9% compare
  2. 15 South Africa 22.8% compare
  3. 16 Serbia 22.5% compare
  4. 18 Indonesia 22.3% compare
  5. 19 Thailand 21.5% compare
  6. 20 Peru 21.0%

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 22.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 27.4% in 2012.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 20.1% in 2018.
How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 17th out of 27 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/belarus/">Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 230 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population