Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 26.2% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
26.2%
Change on year
up 3.0%
World rank
8th
of 30 countries
All-time high
28.0%
in 2012
All-time low
19.2%
in 2016
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

01020302008201320192008: 23.6 preT2009: 25.5 preT2010: 23.7 preT2012: 28 preT2013: 27 preT2014: 26 preT2015: 21.8 preT2016: 19.2 preT2017: 25.8 preT2018: 25.4 preT2019: 26.2 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 26.2% for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in 2019.

That represents a change of up 3.0% on the previous year and up 2.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 28.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 19.2%, in 2016.

Belarus ranks 8th of 30 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT) in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year preT Change
2008 23.6%
2009 25.5% +8.0%
2010 23.7% -7.1%
2012 28.0% +18.2%
2013 27.0% -3.6%
2014 26.0% -3.6%
2015 21.8% -16.2%
2016 19.2% -12.2%
2017 25.8% +34.7%
2018 25.4% -1.5%
2019 26.2% +3.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 24.6% 23.6% 25.5% 2
2010s 24.8% 19.2% 28.0% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 5 Chile 28.7% compare
  2. 6 Sri Lanka 27.7% compare
  3. 7 Republic of Moldova 26.2% compare
  4. 9 Ukraine 26.1% compare
  5. 10 Kazakhstan 25.9% compare
  6. 11 Armenia 25.9% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 26.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 28.0% in 2012.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 19.2% in 2016.
How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 8th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/">Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 256 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population