Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia

Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 51.2% in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
51.2%
Change on year
up 7.1%
World rank
5th
of 30 countries
All-time high
53.1%
in 2018
All-time low
41.1%
in 2007
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia, 2007–2022

02040602007201420222007: 41.12010: 482013: 47.12015: 46.52018: 53.12019: 51.12021: 47.82022: 51.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Serbia is 51.2%, measured in 2022.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.1% on the previous year and up 8.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Serbia peaked at 53.1% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 41.1%, in 2007.

Serbia ranks 5th of 30 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2007 41.1%
2010 48.0% +16.6%
2013 47.1% -1.8%
2015 46.5% -1.3%
2018 53.1% +14.2%
2019 51.1% -3.6%
2021 47.8% -6.4%
2022 51.2% +7.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 1
2010s 49.1% 46.5% 53.1% 5
2020s 49.5% 47.8% 51.2% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 2 Costa Rica 56.3% compare
  2. 3 Kosovo 53.9% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 53.9% compare
  4. 6 Albania 48.0% compare
  5. 7 Argentina 45.3% compare
  6. 8 Georgia 43.7% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Serbia?
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Serbia was 51.2% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 53.1% in 2018.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 41.1% in 2007.
How does Serbia rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
Serbia ranks 5th out of 30 countries with data for 2022.
Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/serbia/">Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 256 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population