Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus

Belarus: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic was 20.9% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
20.9%
Change on year
up 6.1%
World rank
24th
of 31 countries
All-time high
23.2%
in 2012
All-time low
19.7%
in 2018
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus, 2008–2019

05101520252008201320192008: 21.82009: 20.42010: 21.52012: 23.22013: 20.22014: 20.42015: 20.42016: 20.62017: 23.12018: 19.72019: 20.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 20.9% for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.1% on the previous year and up 2.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Belarus peaked at 23.2% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 19.7%, in 2018.

Belarus ranks 24th of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 21.8%
2009 20.4% -6.3%
2010 21.5% +5.5%
2012 23.2% +7.8%
2013 20.2% -13.2%
2014 20.4% +1.2%
2015 20.4% +0.1%
2016 20.6% +0.6%
2017 23.1% +12.4%
2018 19.7% -14.7%
2019 20.9% +6.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 21.1% 20.4% 21.8% 2
2010s 21.1% 19.7% 23.2% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 21 Peru 21.9% compare
  2. 22 Armenia 21.3% compare
  3. 23 Mongolia 21.0% compare
  4. 25 Sri Lanka 20.7% compare
  5. 26 Malawi 19.9% compare
  6. 27 Republic of Moldova 18.7% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Belarus?
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Belarus was 20.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 23.2% in 2012.
What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 19.7% in 2018.
How does Belarus rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
Belarus ranks 24th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/beneficiary-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 319 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population