Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Poland
Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic was 16.1% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland stood at 16.1%.
The figure is up 11.7% on the previous year and down 7.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland peaked at 18.3% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 14.4%, in 2017.
That places Poland 27th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 18.3% | — |
| 2006 | 18.1% | -1.0% |
| 2007 | 18.1% | -0.2% |
| 2008 | 17.2% | -4.7% |
| 2009 | 17.4% | +1.3% |
| 2010 | 18.3% | +4.8% |
| 2011 | 17.9% | -2.0% |
| 2012 | 17.6% | -1.8% |
| 2015 | 15.9% | -9.6% |
| 2016 | 14.9% | -6.5% |
| 2017 | 14.4% | -3.3% |
| 2019 | 16.1% | +11.7% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 16.1% is below the median for high income countries, which is 22.2%, 72% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 16.1% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.2%, 94% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.8% | 17.2% | 18.3% | 5 |
| 2010s | 16.4% | 14.4% | 18.3% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 24 Sri Lanka 16.7% compare
- 25 Kyrgyzstan 16.5% compare
- 26 Romania 16.5% compare
- 28 Republic of Moldova 15.5% compare
- 29 Burkina Faso 14.8% compare
- 30 Pakistan 13.4% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland?
- Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland was 16.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 18.3% in 2010.
- What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.4% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Poland ranks 27th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population