Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland
Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 22.9% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Poland recorded 22.9% for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.6% on the previous year and down 3.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland peaked at 24.5% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 22.9%, in 2019.
Poland ranks 25th of 39 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 23.0% | — |
| 2006 | 23.5% | +2.1% |
| 2007 | 23.3% | -0.7% |
| 2008 | 23.1% | -1.0% |
| 2009 | 23.6% | +2.4% |
| 2010 | 24.2% | +2.3% |
| 2011 | 23.6% | -2.2% |
| 2012 | 24.5% | +3.5% |
| 2015 | 23.5% | -4.1% |
| 2016 | 23.0% | -1.9% |
| 2017 | 24.5% | +6.5% |
| 2019 | 22.9% | -6.6% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 22.9% is below the median for high income countries, which is 23.0%, 99% of the median. (7 countries reporting)
- Poland's 22.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 23.1%, 99% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.3% | 23.0% | 23.6% | 5 |
| 2010s | 23.7% | 22.9% | 24.5% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 22 Russian Federation 23.0% compare
- 23 Panama 23.0% compare
- 24 Indonesia 23.0% compare
- 26 Dominican Republic 22.8% compare
- 27 Armenia 22.6% compare
- 28 Kazakhstan 22.6% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland?
- Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Poland was 22.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 24.5% in 2017.
- What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 22.9% in 2019.
- How does Poland rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Poland ranks 25th out of 39 countries with data for 2019.
- Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population