Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 21.0% in 2020. ▼ Falling
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 21.0% for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in 2020.
That represents a change of down 2.7% on the previous year and down 2.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 24.1% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 20.9%, in 2012.
That places Kyrgyzstan 35th out of 39 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 24.1% | — |
| 2011 | 21.6% | -10.6% |
| 2012 | 20.9% | -2.9% |
| 2013 | 21.9% | +4.7% |
| 2014 | 23.0% | +4.8% |
| 2015 | 22.7% | -1.3% |
| 2016 | 22.8% | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 22.8% | -0.2% |
| 2018 | 21.9% | -3.8% |
| 2019 | 21.6% | -1.5% |
| 2020 | 21.0% | -2.7% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 21.0% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 21.0%, 1.0× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 21.0% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 22.8%, 92% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.1% | 24.1% | 24.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 22.1% | 20.9% | 23.0% | 9 |
| 2020s | 21.0% | 21.0% | 21.0% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Kyrgyzstan?
- Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Kyrgyzstan was 21.0% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 24.1% in 2006.
- What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 20.9% in 2012.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 35th out of 39 countries with data for 2020.
- Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population