Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All in Belarus

Belarus: Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All was 2.41 in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
2.41
Change on year
down 3.6%
World rank
3rd
of 34 countries
All-time high
6.44
in 2016
All-time low
1.02
in 2009
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All in Belarus, 2008–2019

2462008201320192008: 1.12009: 12010: 1.22012: 1.52013: 1.92014: 2.52015: 2.22016: 6.42017: 2.22018: 2.52019: 2.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 2.41 for average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all in 2019.

That represents a change of down 3.6% on the previous year and up 135.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all in Belarus peaked at 6.44 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 1.02, in 2009.

Belarus ranks 3rd of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All Social Assistance -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 1.06
2009 1.02 -3.8%
2010 1.23 +20.3%
2012 1.46 +18.7%
2013 1.94 +33.2%
2014 2.49 +28.4%
2015 2.24 -10.4%
2016 6.44 +188.1%
2017 2.23 -65.4%
2018 2.49 +12.1%
2019 2.41 -3.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.04 1.02 1.06 2
2010s 2.55 1.23 6.44 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Poland 4.06 compare
  2. 2 Serbia 2.62 compare
  3. 4 Georgia 2.29 compare
  4. 5 Romania 2.19 compare
  5. 6 Kazakhstan 1.73 compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all in Belarus?
Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all in Belarus was 2.41 in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 6.44 in 2016.
What is the lowest average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 1.02 in 2009.
How does Belarus rank for average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all?
Belarus ranks 3rd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - all rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 135.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/average-per-capita-transfer-held-by-1st-quintile-poorest-all-social-assistance-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/average-per-capita-transfer-held-by-1st-quintile-poorest-all-social-assistance-rural/belarus/">Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) - All Social Assistance -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 329 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Average transfer amount of Social Assistance programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)