Adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador

Ecuador: Adequacy of social safety net programs was 14.8% in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
14.8%
Change on year
down 4.4%
World rank
12th
of 35 countries
All-time high
15.9%
in 2019
All-time low
10.4%
in 2012
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador, 2008–2022

0510152008201520222008: 10.5 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2010: 11.4 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2011: 11.7 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2012: 10.4 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2014: 10.8 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2015: 11 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2016: 12.6 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2017: 11 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2018: 13.1 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2019: 15.9 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2020: 12.5 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2021: 15.5 % of total welfare of beneficiary households2022: 14.8 % of total welfare of beneficiary households

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of total welfare of beneficiary households.

Analysis

In 2022, adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador stood at 14.8%.

That represents a change of down 4.4% on the previous year and up 41.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador peaked at 15.9% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 10.4%, in 2012.

Ecuador ranks 12th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.

Adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households) in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year % of total welfare of beneficiary households Change
2008 10.5%
2010 11.4% +8.8%
2011 11.7% +2.3%
2012 10.4% -10.9%
2014 10.8% +3.2%
2015 11.0% +2.1%
2016 12.6% +14.4%
2017 11.0% -12.8%
2018 13.1% +19.8%
2019 15.9% +20.8%
2020 12.5% -20.9%
2021 15.5% +23.3%
2022 14.8% -4.4%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 14.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 9.8%, 1.5× the median. (23 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 14.8% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 6.9%, 2.1× the median. (15 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 1
2010s 12.0% 10.4% 15.9% 9
2020s 14.3% 12.5% 15.5% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 9 Kyrgyzstan 16.9% compare
  2. 10 Chile 16.8% compare
  3. 11 Costa Rica 15.0% compare
  4. 13 Romania 14.6% compare
  5. 14 Belarus 13.4% compare
  6. 15 Republic of Moldova 13.2% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More work & labour data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador?
Adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador was 14.8% in 2022, according to ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest adequacy of social safety net programs recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 15.9% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of social safety net programs recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 10.4% in 2012.
How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of social safety net programs?
Ecuador ranks 12th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of social safety net programs rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is up 41.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as part of Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-social-safety-net-programs-percent-of-total-welfare-of-beneficiary-households/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-social-safety-net-programs-percent-of-total-welfare-of-beneficiary-households/ecuador/">Adequacy of social safety net programs in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)
Unit
% of total welfare of beneficiary households
Source
ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 348 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.