Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban was 23.1% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban in Belarus is 23.1%, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of up 3.5% on the previous year and up 120.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban in Belarus peaked at 76.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 8.3%, in 2008.
That places Belarus 5th out of 25 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 8.3% | — |
| 2009 | 10.5% | +25.8% |
| 2010 | 10.9% | +4.3% |
| 2012 | 12.6% | +15.7% |
| 2013 | 16.9% | +33.7% |
| 2014 | 20.3% | +20.1% |
| 2015 | 19.3% | -4.6% |
| 2016 | 76.0% | +293.3% |
| 2017 | 20.4% | -73.1% |
| 2018 | 22.3% | +9.1% |
| 2019 | 23.1% | +3.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.4% | 8.3% | 10.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 24.7% | 10.9% | 76.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban in Belarus was 23.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 76.0% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.3% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban?
- Belarus ranks 5th out of 25 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -urban rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 120.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group