Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural was 7.3% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
7.3%
Change on year
up 11.9%
World rank
16th
of 24 countries
All-time high
7.3%
in 2019
All-time low
2.9%
in 2009
Years of data
5
2006–2019

Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Sri Lanka, 2006–2019

024682006201220192006: 3.72009: 2.92012: 3.62016: 6.52019: 7.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural in Sri Lanka stood at 7.3%. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 11.9% on the previous year and up 149.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural in Sri Lanka peaked at 7.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2.9%, in 2009.

That places Sri Lanka 16th out of 24 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Sri Lanka, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Sri Lanka, 2006 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2006 3.7%
2009 2.9% -19.9%
2012 3.6% +23.4%
2016 6.5% +80.6%
2019 7.3% +11.9%

Sri Lanka compared with similar countries

  • Sri Lanka's 7.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 11.3%, 65% of the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.3% 2.9% 3.7% 2
2010s 5.8% 3.6% 7.3% 3

Countries ranked near Sri Lanka

  1. 13 Ukraine 11.4% compare
  2. 14 Vietnam 11.1% compare
  3. 15 Mongolia 8.5% compare
  4. 17 Turkey 5.9% compare
  5. 18 Pakistan 4.8% compare
  6. 19 Indonesia 4.2% compare

See the full ranking of 24 places →

More work & labour data for Sri Lanka

All data for Sri Lanka →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural in Sri Lanka?
Adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural in Sri Lanka was 7.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural recorded in Sri Lanka?
The highest recorded value was 7.3% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural recorded in Sri Lanka?
The lowest recorded value was 2.9% in 2009.
How does Sri Lanka rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural?
Sri Lanka ranks 16th out of 24 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits (%) - unconditional cash transfers -rural rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
Over the last ten years it is up 149.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Sri Lanka. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/sri-lanka/">Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Sri Lanka</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
24 places, 202 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group