Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Paraguay
Paraguay: Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban was 15.3% in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Paraguay, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Paraguay stood at 15.3%.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 23.7% on the previous year and down 6.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Paraguay peaked at 183.9% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 1.3%, in 2014.
That places Paraguay 24th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 34.6% | — |
| 2008 | 24.8% | -28.4% |
| 2009 | 30.2% | +21.7% |
| 2010 | 21.4% | -29.0% |
| 2011 | 22.3% | +4.0% |
| 2012 | 16.3% | -26.8% |
| 2013 | 153.5% | +841.5% |
| 2014 | 1.3% | -99.2% |
| 2015 | 12.0% | +860.8% |
| 2016 | 13.6% | +13.0% |
| 2017 | 183.9% | +1252.7% |
| 2018 | 16.1% | -91.3% |
| 2019 | 14.6% | -9.2% |
| 2020 | 9.6% | -34.5% |
| 2021 | 20.0% | +109.6% |
| 2022 | 15.3% | -23.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.9% | 24.8% | 34.6% | 3 |
| 2010s | 45.5% | 1.3% | 183.9% | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.0% | 9.6% | 20.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
- 21 Costa Rica 17.2% compare
- 22 Colombia 16.1% compare
- 23 Peru 15.9% compare
- 25 El Salvador 14.2% compare
- 26 Uruguay 8.0% compare
- 27 Burkina Faso 6.5% compare
More work & labour data for Paraguay
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.23 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.2175 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.2425 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.2 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.9753 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 6,607 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,290 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 4,534 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 4,514 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 9,048 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Paraguay?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Paraguay was 15.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 183.9% in 2017.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.3% in 2014.
- How does Paraguay rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban?
- Paraguay ranks 24th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group