Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban was 50.6% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
50.6%
Change on year
up 54.4%
World rank
9th
of 27 countries
All-time high
50.6%
in 2020
All-time low
22.2%
in 2009
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Mongolia, 2007–2020

02040602007201320202007: 34.72009: 22.22010: 29.42011: 25.62012: 24.42014: 30.92016: 31.42018: 32.82020: 50.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Mongolia stood at 50.6%. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 54.4% on the previous year and up 72.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Mongolia peaked at 50.6% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 22.2%, in 2009.

Mongolia ranks 9th of 27 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 34.7%
2009 22.2% -36.0%
2010 29.4% +32.3%
2011 25.6% -13.0%
2012 24.4% -4.5%
2014 30.9% +26.3%
2016 31.4% +1.6%
2018 32.8% +4.5%
2020 50.6% +54.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.4% 22.2% 34.7% 2
2010s 29.1% 24.4% 32.8% 6
2020s 50.6% 50.6% 50.6% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 7 Georgia 53.3% compare
  2. 8 Republic of Moldova 51.6% compare
  3. 10 Türkiye 36.4% compare
  4. 11 South Africa 32.5% compare
  5. 12 Sri Lanka 30.8% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban in Mongolia was 50.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 50.6% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 22.2% in 2009.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban?
Mongolia ranks 9th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 72.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-percent-international-private-transfers-urban/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group