Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador

Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban was 12.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
12.0%
Change on year
up 7.7%
World rank
26th
of 31 countries
All-time high
33.3%
in 2010
All-time low
11.1%
in 2021
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador, 2008–2022

1015202530352008201520222008: 252010: 33.32011: 28.22012: 29.22014: 16.82015: 14.72016: 15.12017: 12.62018: 12.42019: 11.32020: 13.92021: 11.12022: 12

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Ecuador stood at 12.0%.

The figure is up 7.7% on the previous year and down 59.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Ecuador peaked at 33.3% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 11.1%, in 2021.

That places Ecuador 26th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 25.0%
2010 33.3% +33.4%
2011 28.2% -15.3%
2012 29.2% +3.3%
2014 16.8% -42.4%
2015 14.7% -12.4%
2016 15.1% +2.9%
2017 12.6% -16.8%
2018 12.4% -1.7%
2019 11.3% -9.2%
2020 13.9% +23.2%
2021 11.1% -19.9%
2022 12.0% +7.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 1
2010s 19.3% 11.3% 33.3% 9
2020s 12.3% 11.1% 13.9% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 23 Honduras 14.1% compare
  2. 24 Mexico 13.6% compare
  3. 25 Malawi 12.8% compare
  4. 27 Belarus 11.2% compare
  5. 28 Panama 10.3% compare
  6. 29 El Salvador 9.6% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Ecuador?
Adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Ecuador was 12.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 33.3% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 11.1% in 2021.
How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban?
Ecuador ranks 26th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 59.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/ecuador/">Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 316 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group