Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban was 18.7% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Costa Rica stood at 18.7%. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.5% on the previous year and up 28.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Costa Rica peaked at 18.7% in 2022 and was at its lowest, 13.6%, in 2011.
Costa Rica ranks 14th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 15.2% | — |
| 2010 | 14.2% | -6.7% |
| 2011 | 13.6% | -4.4% |
| 2012 | 14.5% | +6.9% |
| 2014 | 13.6% | -6.3% |
| 2015 | 13.9% | +2.5% |
| 2016 | 15.2% | +8.7% |
| 2017 | 15.4% | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 16.5% | +7.6% |
| 2019 | 16.4% | -1.0% |
| 2020 | 16.9% | +3.3% |
| 2021 | 18.2% | +7.9% |
| 2022 | 18.7% | +2.5% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 18.7% is above the median for high income countries, which is 18.4%, 1.0× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 18.7% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 15.6%, 1.2× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 15.2% | 15.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 14.8% | 13.6% | 16.5% | 9 |
| 2020s | 17.9% | 16.9% | 18.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Costa Rica?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban in Costa Rica was 18.7% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 18.7% in 2022.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.6% in 2011.
- How does Costa Rica rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban?
- Costa Rica ranks 14th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -urban rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 28.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group