Adequacy of benefits (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban was 46.8% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Kyrgyzstan is 46.8%, measured in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.7% on the previous year and up 56.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 53.0% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 29.9%, in 2011.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 36 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 32.2% | — |
| 2011 | 29.9% | -7.4% |
| 2012 | 38.0% | +27.4% |
| 2013 | 38.9% | +2.4% |
| 2014 | 52.1% | +33.7% |
| 2015 | 53.0% | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 50.4% | -4.9% |
| 2017 | 50.9% | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 47.8% | -6.2% |
| 2019 | 46.1% | -3.6% |
| 2020 | 46.8% | +1.7% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 46.8% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 24.1%, 1.9× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 46.8% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 48.4%, 97% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.2% | 32.2% | 32.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 45.2% | 29.9% | 53.0% | 9 |
| 2020s | 46.8% | 46.8% | 46.8% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban in Kyrgyzstan was 46.8% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 53.0% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 29.9% in 2011.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th out of 36 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) -all social protection and labor -urban rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group