Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 43.3% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 43.3% for adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural in 2022.
The figure is down 3.0% on the previous year and up 43.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural in Costa Rica peaked at 47.4% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 30.3%, in 2012.
Costa Rica ranks 16th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 32.5% | — |
| 2010 | 30.9% | -5.1% |
| 2011 | 31.0% | +0.3% |
| 2012 | 30.3% | -2.2% |
| 2014 | 32.9% | +8.7% |
| 2015 | 39.0% | +18.5% |
| 2016 | 45.1% | +15.6% |
| 2017 | 41.9% | -6.9% |
| 2018 | 43.2% | +3.0% |
| 2019 | 44.9% | +4.0% |
| 2020 | 47.4% | +5.4% |
| 2021 | 44.6% | -5.8% |
| 2022 | 43.3% | -3.0% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 43.3% is below the median for high income countries, which is 47.8%, 91% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 43.3% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 40.1%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.5% | 32.5% | 32.5% | 1 |
| 2010s | 37.7% | 30.3% | 45.1% | 9 |
| 2020s | 45.1% | 43.3% | 47.4% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 13 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 45.9% compare
- 14 Türkiye 45.1% compare
- 15 Ukraine 43.5% compare
- 17 Dominican Republic 42.2% compare
- 18 Kyrgyzstan 41.1% compare
- 19 Pakistan 39.5% compare
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural in Costa Rica?
- Adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural in Costa Rica was 43.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 47.4% in 2020.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.3% in 2012.
- How does Costa Rica rank for adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Costa Rica ranks 16th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 43.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group