Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) was 54.3% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 54.3% for adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) in 2021.
That represents a change of up 4.3% on the previous year and down 81.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) in Georgia peaked at 289.6% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 37.5%, in 2015.
Georgia ranks 11th of 27 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) in Georgia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 289.6% | — |
| 2012 | 59.5% | -79.4% |
| 2013 | 38.5% | -35.3% |
| 2014 | 51.1% | +32.7% |
| 2015 | 37.5% | -26.7% |
| 2016 | 54.7% | +45.9% |
| 2017 | 58.2% | +6.3% |
| 2018 | 61.9% | +6.4% |
| 2019 | 60.3% | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 52.1% | -13.6% |
| 2021 | 54.3% | +4.3% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 54.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 64.4%, 84% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 54.3% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 41.5%, 1.3× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 79.0% | 37.5% | 289.6% | 9 |
| 2020s | 53.2% | 52.1% | 54.3% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 8 South Africa 58.7% compare
- 9 Kosovo 56.5% compare
- 9 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 56.5% compare
- 12 Sri Lanka 46.2% compare
- 13 Colombia 44.9% compare
- 14 Republic of Moldova 41.5% compare
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) in Georgia was 54.3% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 289.6% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 37.5% in 2015.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%)?
- Georgia ranks 11th out of 27 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 81.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group