Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic was 9,836.6% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Poland stood at 9,836.6%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 62,541.3% on the previous year and up 77,755.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Poland peaked at 9,836.6% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 12.6%, in 2009.
That places Poland 1st out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic in Poland, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 15.1% | — |
| 2006 | 12.9% | -14.7% |
| 2007 | 13.7% | +6.7% |
| 2008 | 14.9% | +8.3% |
| 2009 | 12.6% | -15.1% |
| 2010 | 13.8% | +9.2% |
| 2011 | 13.5% | -2.3% |
| 2012 | 13.5% | -0.1% |
| 2015 | 12.7% | -6.0% |
| 2016 | 12.9% | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 15.7% | +21.8% |
| 2019 | 9,836.6% | +62541.3% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 9,836.6% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 30.1%, 327.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Poland's 9,836.6% is above the median for high income countries, which is 27.3%, 360.0× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.8% | 12.6% | 15.1% | 5 |
| 2010s | 1,416.9% | 12.7% | 9,836.6% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic in Poland was 9,836.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 9,836.6% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.6% in 2009.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 77,755.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group