Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 9.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
9.1%
Change on year
up 22.2%
World rank
8th
of 26 countries
All-time high
10.3%
in 2012
All-time low
5.6%
in 2008
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, 2005–2019

02.557.5102005201220192005: 6.72006: 7.12007: 6.82008: 5.62009: 6.62010: 6.72011: 8.32012: 10.32015: 9.72016: 8.12017: 7.52019: 9.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland is 9.1%, measured in 2019.

That represents a change of up 22.2% on the previous year and up 38.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland peaked at 10.3% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 5.6%, in 2008.

Poland ranks 8th of 26 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 6.7%
2006 7.1% +7.0%
2007 6.8% -4.3%
2008 5.6% -18.5%
2009 6.6% +19.0%
2010 6.7% +1.8%
2011 8.3% +23.4%
2012 10.3% +23.5%
2015 9.7% -5.9%
2016 8.1% -15.7%
2017 7.5% -8.1%
2019 9.1% +22.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 6.6% 5.6% 7.1% 5
2010s 8.5% 6.7% 10.3% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 5 Belarus 11.8% compare
  2. 6 Kyrgyzstan 10.1% compare
  3. 7 Pakistan 9.5% compare
  4. 9 Serbia 9.0% compare
  5. 10 Kazakhstan 8.0% compare
  6. 11 Romania 7.6% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland was 9.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 10.3% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 5.6% in 2008.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
Poland ranks 8th out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 38.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 220 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group