Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 11.9% in 2017. ▬ Flat

Latest (2017)
11.9%
World rank
1st
of 26 countries
All-time high
11.9%
in 2017
All-time low
7.3%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

02.557.51012.52006201120172006: 11.5 preT2011: 11 preT2012: 7.3 preT2013: 11.4 preT2017: 11.9 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) recorded 11.9% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in 2017. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 3.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 11.9% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 7.3%, in 2012.

That places Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 1st out of 26 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year preT Change
2006 11.5%
2011 11.0% -4.6%
2012 7.3% -33.9%
2013 11.4% +56.3%
2017 11.9% +4.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 11.5% 11.5% 11.5% 1
2010s 10.4% 7.3% 11.9% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 1 Kosovo 11.9% compare
  2. 3 Belarus 9.3% compare
  3. 4 Poland 8.7% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 11.9% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 11.9% in 2017.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 7.3% in 2012.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 1st out of 26 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 220 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group