Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Mexico
Mexico: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 26.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Mexico, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Mexico stood at 26.0%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 17.8% on the previous year and up 39.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Mexico peaked at 42.0% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 18.1%, in 2016.
That places Mexico 12th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Mexico, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 23.2% | — |
| 2010 | 42.0% | +81.0% |
| 2012 | 18.6% | -55.7% |
| 2014 | 32.7% | +75.3% |
| 2016 | 18.1% | -44.5% |
| 2018 | 30.0% | +65.4% |
| 2020 | 22.1% | -26.4% |
| 2022 | 26.0% | +17.8% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 26.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.5%, 1.1× the median. (17 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 26.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.5%, 1.4× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.2% | 23.2% | 23.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 28.3% | 18.1% | 42.0% | 5 |
| 2020s | 24.1% | 22.1% | 26.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 9 Georgia 46.0% compare
- 10 Türkiye 37.6% compare
- 11 Sri Lanka 35.8% compare
- 13 Costa Rica 25.3% compare
- 14 Dominican Republic 23.5% compare
- 15 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 21.9% compare
More work & labour data for Mexico
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5786 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5539 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.6038 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.41 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.5363 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 144,910 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 19,369 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 65,616 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 64,633 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 130,249 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Mexico?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Mexico was 26.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 42.0% in 2010.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 18.1% in 2016.
- How does Mexico rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Mexico ranks 12th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group