Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 18.8% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 18.8% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in 2022.
The figure is down 21.0% on the previous year and down 4.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Ecuador peaked at 28.7% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 18.4%, in 2018.
That places Ecuador 21st out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 26.9% | — |
| 2010 | 28.5% | +5.8% |
| 2011 | 28.7% | +0.8% |
| 2012 | 19.6% | -31.6% |
| 2014 | 22.2% | +12.9% |
| 2015 | 21.8% | -1.8% |
| 2016 | 26.5% | +22.0% |
| 2017 | 24.4% | -8.1% |
| 2018 | 18.4% | -24.7% |
| 2019 | 19.6% | +6.6% |
| 2020 | 20.6% | +5.3% |
| 2021 | 23.8% | +15.3% |
| 2022 | 18.8% | -21.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 18.8% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.5%, 80% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 18.8% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.8%, 100% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.9% | 26.9% | 26.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 23.3% | 18.4% | 28.7% | 9 |
| 2020s | 21.1% | 18.8% | 23.8% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Ecuador was 18.8% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 28.7% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 18.4% in 2018.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Ecuador ranks 21st out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group