Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 8,037.3% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland stood at 8,037.3%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 112,972.0% on the previous year and up 59,271.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland peaked at 8,037.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 7.1%, in 2017.
Poland ranks 1st of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 15.9% | — |
| 2006 | 14.5% | -8.8% |
| 2007 | 15.3% | +4.9% |
| 2008 | 14.2% | -7.2% |
| 2009 | 13.5% | -4.4% |
| 2010 | 16.7% | +23.6% |
| 2011 | 14.9% | -10.7% |
| 2012 | 14.5% | -2.7% |
| 2015 | 12.2% | -16.4% |
| 2016 | 8.3% | -31.6% |
| 2017 | 7.1% | -14.5% |
| 2019 | 8,037.3% | +112972.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 8,037.3% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 27.1%, 296.3× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Poland's 8,037.3% is above the median for high income countries, which is 17.1%, 470.6× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.7% | 13.5% | 15.9% | 5 |
| 2010s | 1,158.7% | 7.1% | 8,037.3% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland was 8,037.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 8,037.3% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.1% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 59,271.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group