Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Uruguay
Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 20.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Uruguay, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 20.0% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in 2022.
The figure is up 3.1% on the previous year and up 13.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Uruguay peaked at 20.2% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 13.1%, in 2017.
Uruguay ranks 9th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 19.4% | — |
| 2009 | 20.2% | +4.1% |
| 2010 | 20.0% | -1.0% |
| 2011 | 19.0% | -5.2% |
| 2012 | 17.7% | -6.6% |
| 2015 | 18.1% | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 18.2% | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 13.1% | -28.3% |
| 2018 | 17.8% | +36.6% |
| 2019 | 16.4% | -8.2% |
| 2020 | 17.8% | +8.8% |
| 2021 | 19.4% | +9.1% |
| 2022 | 20.0% | +3.1% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 20.0% is above the median for high income countries, which is 17.5%, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 20.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 13.0%, 1.5× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.8% | 19.4% | 20.2% | 2 |
| 2010s | 17.5% | 13.1% | 20.0% | 8 |
| 2020s | 19.1% | 17.8% | 20.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More work & labour data for Uruguay
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.02 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0269 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 3,567 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 95.27 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,144 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,102 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,246 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Uruguay?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Uruguay was 20.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 20.2% in 2009.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.1% in 2017.
- How does Uruguay rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Uruguay ranks 9th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group