Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil
Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 17.9% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Latest (2022)
17.9%
Change on year
down 27.9%
World rank
13th
of 31 countries
All-time high
24.8%
in 2021
All-time low
17.9%
in 2022
Years of data
8
2015–2022
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, 2015–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil stood at 17.9%. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 27.9% on the previous year and down 13.3% over ten years.
That places Brazil 13th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 20.6% | — |
| 2016 | 19.5% | -5.2% |
| 2017 | 20.2% | +3.4% |
| 2018 | 18.6% | -7.9% |
| 2019 | 17.9% | -3.4% |
| 2020 | 19.4% | +8.2% |
| 2021 | 24.8% | +27.7% |
| 2022 | 17.9% | -27.9% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 17.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.4%, 1.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 17.9% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 13.0%, 1.4× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.4% | 17.9% | 20.6% | 5 |
| 2020s | 20.7% | 17.9% | 24.8% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 10 Paraguay 18.8% compare
- 11 Dominican Republic 18.2% compare
- 12 Türkiye 18.2% compare
- 14 Kazakhstan 17.4% compare
- 15 Georgia 17.0% compare
- 16 Costa Rica 14.9% compare
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil was 17.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 24.8% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.9% in 2022.
- How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Brazil ranks 13th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 13.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group