Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 8.3% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Ecuador stood at 8.3%.
The figure is up 11.1% on the previous year and down 63.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Ecuador peaked at 24.1% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 7.3%, in 2017.
Ecuador ranks 27th of 30 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 19.8% | — |
| 2010 | 21.2% | +6.8% |
| 2011 | 24.1% | +13.6% |
| 2012 | 22.7% | -5.7% |
| 2014 | 12.8% | -43.8% |
| 2015 | 7.5% | -41.0% |
| 2016 | 9.6% | +27.7% |
| 2017 | 7.3% | -23.8% |
| 2018 | 7.9% | +8.5% |
| 2019 | 8.0% | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 9.7% | +21.4% |
| 2021 | 7.5% | -22.8% |
| 2022 | 8.3% | +11.1% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 8.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 14.0%, 59% of the median. (18 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 8.3% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 12.3%, 67% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.8% | 19.8% | 19.8% | 1 |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 7.3% | 24.1% | 9 |
| 2020s | 8.5% | 7.5% | 9.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Ecuador was 8.3% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 24.1% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.3% in 2017.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Ecuador ranks 27th out of 30 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 63.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group