Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil
Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 18.0% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Latest (2022)
18.0%
Change on year
down 28.5%
World rank
14th
of 31 countries
All-time high
25.2%
in 2021
All-time low
18.0%
in 2022
Years of data
8
2015–2022
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, 2015–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 18.0% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.5% on the previous year and down 11.7% over ten years.
That places Brazil 14th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Brazil, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 20.4% | — |
| 2016 | 19.4% | -4.8% |
| 2017 | 20.9% | +7.5% |
| 2018 | 18.5% | -11.5% |
| 2019 | 18.2% | -1.3% |
| 2020 | 19.7% | +8.0% |
| 2021 | 25.2% | +28.0% |
| 2022 | 18.0% | -28.5% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 18.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.0%, 1.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 18.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 12.9%, 1.4× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.5% | 18.2% | 20.9% | 5 |
| 2020s | 21.0% | 18.0% | 25.2% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 11 Paraguay 18.6% compare
- 12 Kazakhstan 18.4% compare
- 13 Viet Nam 18.3% compare
- 15 Dominican Republic 18.0% compare
- 16 Türkiye 17.8% compare
- 17 Costa Rica 14.7% compare
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Brazil was 18.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 25.2% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 18.0% in 2022.
- How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Brazil ranks 14th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group