Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social was 50.0% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland stood at 50.0%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.4% on the previous year and up 8.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland peaked at 58.1% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 44.3%, in 2008.
That places Poland 2nd out of 37 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 50.2% | — |
| 2006 | 50.0% | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 45.8% | -8.4% |
| 2008 | 44.3% | -3.3% |
| 2009 | 46.3% | +4.5% |
| 2010 | 48.5% | +4.7% |
| 2011 | 50.7% | +4.5% |
| 2012 | 52.9% | +4.4% |
| 2015 | 58.1% | +9.8% |
| 2016 | 54.0% | -7.1% |
| 2017 | 46.6% | -13.7% |
| 2019 | 50.0% | +7.4% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 50.0% is above the median for high income countries, which is 40.0%, 1.3× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 50.0% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 38.4%, 1.3× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.3% | 44.3% | 50.2% | 5 |
| 2010s | 51.5% | 46.6% | 58.1% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 Thailand 86.2% compare
- 3 Romania 48.9% compare
- 4 South Africa 48.7% compare
- 5 Kazakhstan 47.1% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland was 50.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 58.1% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 44.3% in 2008.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Poland ranks 2nd out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group