Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social was 32.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Belarus stood at 32.9%.
That represents a change of up 13.1% on the previous year and up 52.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Belarus peaked at 44.4% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 21.6%, in 2009.
Belarus ranks 18th of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 24.8% | — |
| 2009 | 21.6% | -13.1% |
| 2010 | 22.9% | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 26.8% | +17.0% |
| 2013 | 29.6% | +10.3% |
| 2014 | 28.8% | -2.6% |
| 2015 | 33.3% | +15.6% |
| 2016 | 44.4% | +33.2% |
| 2017 | 31.6% | -28.7% |
| 2018 | 29.0% | -8.1% |
| 2019 | 32.9% | +13.1% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 32.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 32.7%, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 32.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 41.3%, 80% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.2% | 21.6% | 24.8% | 2 |
| 2010s | 31.0% | 22.9% | 44.4% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Belarus was 32.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 44.4% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 21.6% in 2009.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 18th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 52.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group