Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social was 45.7% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
45.7%
Change on year
up 30.2%
World rank
6th
of 36 countries
All-time high
50.7%
in 2015
All-time low
35.1%
in 2017
Years of data
12
2005–2019
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Poland recorded 45.7% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 30.2% on the previous year and up 6.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland peaked at 50.7% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 35.1%, in 2017.
Poland ranks 6th of 36 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 48.6% | — |
| 2006 | 45.9% | -5.7% |
| 2007 | 43.6% | -4.9% |
| 2008 | 41.2% | -5.6% |
| 2009 | 43.2% | +4.7% |
| 2010 | 44.3% | +2.7% |
| 2011 | 47.1% | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 47.2% | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 50.7% | +7.4% |
| 2016 | 48.6% | -4.2% |
| 2017 | 35.1% | -27.7% |
| 2019 | 45.7% | +30.2% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 45.7% is above the median for high income countries, which is 32.3%, 1.4× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 45.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 34.9%, 1.3× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.5% | 41.2% | 48.6% | 5 |
| 2010s | 45.5% | 35.1% | 50.7% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 3 Belarus 51.8% compare
- 4 South Africa 51.0% compare
- 5 Kazakhstan 46.5% compare
- 7 Brazil 41.5% compare
- 8 Republic of Moldova 37.5% compare
- 9 Türkiye 35.8% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Poland was 45.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 50.7% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 35.1% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Poland ranks 6th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group