Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social was 27.3% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kyrgyzstan is 27.3%, measured in 2020.
That represents a change of up 4.4% on the previous year and up 24.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 29.2% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 17.3%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 17.3% | — |
| 2011 | 21.8% | +26.4% |
| 2012 | 29.2% | +33.9% |
| 2013 | 25.7% | -12.0% |
| 2014 | 26.3% | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 27.4% | +4.5% |
| 2016 | 25.7% | -6.2% |
| 2017 | 25.3% | -1.7% |
| 2018 | 26.4% | +4.6% |
| 2019 | 26.1% | -1.2% |
| 2020 | 27.3% | +4.4% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 27.3% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 20.8%, 1.3× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 27.3% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 24.1%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.3% | 17.3% | 17.3% | 1 |
| 2010s | 26.0% | 21.8% | 29.2% | 9 |
| 2020s | 27.3% | 27.3% | 27.3% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social in Kyrgyzstan was 27.3% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 29.2% in 2012.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.3% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th out of 37 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 24.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group