Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 72.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland is 72.8%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 28.6% on the previous year and up 25.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 72.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 55.9%, in 2008.
Poland ranks 3rd of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 63.1% | — |
| 2006 | 62.1% | -1.6% |
| 2007 | 58.9% | -5.1% |
| 2008 | 55.9% | -5.2% |
| 2009 | 58.2% | +4.2% |
| 2010 | 59.9% | +3.0% |
| 2011 | 63.0% | +5.1% |
| 2012 | 65.3% | +3.5% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | +4.8% |
| 2016 | 63.7% | -6.8% |
| 2017 | 56.7% | -11.1% |
| 2019 | 72.8% | +28.6% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 72.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 48.7%, 1.5× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 72.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 43.0%, 1.7× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.7% | 55.9% | 63.1% | 5 |
| 2010s | 64.3% | 56.7% | 72.8% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 Thailand 90.2% compare
- 2 Romania 79.8% compare
- 4 Uruguay 54.7% compare
- 5 Kazakhstan 53.3% compare
- 6 South Africa 48.7% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland was 72.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 72.8% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 55.9% in 2008.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group