Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 44.5% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 44.5% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is up 15.5% on the previous year and up 26.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 44.5% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 35.3%, in 2009.
That places Belarus 8th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 38.3% | — |
| 2009 | 35.3% | -7.8% |
| 2010 | 36.4% | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 38.3% | +5.3% |
| 2013 | 41.3% | +7.7% |
| 2014 | 37.7% | -8.6% |
| 2015 | 41.2% | +9.3% |
| 2016 | 44.2% | +7.2% |
| 2017 | 41.9% | -5.3% |
| 2018 | 38.5% | -7.9% |
| 2019 | 44.5% | +15.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.8% | 35.3% | 38.3% | 2 |
| 2010s | 40.4% | 36.4% | 44.5% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 5 Kazakhstan 53.3% compare
- 6 South Africa 48.7% compare
- 7 Serbia 47.7% compare
- 9 Mongolia 43.8% compare
- 10 Republic of Moldova 43.0% compare
- 11 Costa Rica 42.7% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 44.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 44.5% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 35.3% in 2009.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 8th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group