Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in South Africa
South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 46.9% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in South Africa, 2005–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
South Africa recorded 46.9% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2021.
That represents a change of down 17.6% on the previous year and up 11.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in South Africa peaked at 73.4% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 33.1%, in 2018.
South Africa ranks 8th of 34 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in South Africa, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 36.4% | — |
| 2014 | 42.1% | +15.5% |
| 2016 | 61.2% | +45.5% |
| 2018 | 33.1% | -45.9% |
| 2019 | 73.4% | +121.6% |
| 2020 | 56.9% | -22.5% |
| 2021 | 46.9% | -17.6% |
South Africa compared with similar countries
- South Africa's 46.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 39.3%, 1.2× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.4% | 36.4% | 36.4% | 1 |
| 2010s | 52.4% | 33.1% | 73.4% | 4 |
| 2020s | 51.9% | 46.9% | 56.9% | 2 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
- 5 Serbia 53.9% compare
- 6 Kazakhstan 52.6% compare
- 7 Moldova 51.3% compare
- 9 Mongolia 45.6% compare
- 10 Kyrgyzstan 43.7% compare
- 11 Costa Rica 42.6% compare
More work & labour data for South Africa
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2264 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.242 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2122 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.23 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.8748 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 58,057 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 14,698 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 49,126 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 45,189 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 94,314 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in South Africa?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in South Africa was 46.9% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 73.4% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.1% in 2018.
- How does South Africa rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- South Africa ranks 8th out of 34 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group