Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 60.1% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland stood at 60.1%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 44.1% on the previous year and up 19.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 60.1% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 41.7%, in 2017.
Poland ranks 3rd of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 56.7% | — |
| 2006 | 53.4% | -5.9% |
| 2007 | 51.0% | -4.5% |
| 2008 | 48.3% | -5.2% |
| 2009 | 50.1% | +3.7% |
| 2010 | 51.5% | +2.7% |
| 2011 | 53.5% | +4.0% |
| 2012 | 54.6% | +2.0% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | +2.0% |
| 2016 | 55.3% | -0.8% |
| 2017 | 41.7% | -24.6% |
| 2019 | 60.1% | +44.1% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 60.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 37.2%, 1.6× the median. (11 countries reporting)
- Poland's 60.1% is above the median for high income countries, which is 43.4%, 1.4× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.9% | 48.3% | 56.7% | 5 |
| 2010s | 53.2% | 41.7% | 60.1% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 Thailand 105.7% compare
- 2 Romania 69.8% compare
- 4 Belarus 58.7% compare
- 5 Kazakhstan 52.1% compare
- 6 South Africa 51.0% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland was 60.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 60.1% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 41.7% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group