Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 43.8% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland is 43.8%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 29.7% on the previous year and up 18.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 43.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 33.7%, in 2017.
That places Poland 3rd out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 41.5% | — |
| 2006 | 40.3% | -3.0% |
| 2007 | 37.4% | -7.2% |
| 2008 | 35.7% | -4.5% |
| 2009 | 37.0% | +3.7% |
| 2010 | 38.1% | +3.0% |
| 2011 | 40.1% | +5.1% |
| 2012 | 41.3% | +3.1% |
| 2015 | 42.0% | +1.6% |
| 2016 | 40.3% | -4.0% |
| 2017 | 33.7% | -16.2% |
| 2019 | 43.8% | +29.7% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 43.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 40.4%, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 43.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 29.8%, 1.5× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.4% | 35.7% | 41.5% | 5 |
| 2010s | 39.9% | 33.7% | 43.8% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 Thailand 48.8% compare
- 2 Uruguay 48.5% compare
- 4 South Africa 42.6% compare
- 5 Romania 41.8% compare
- 6 Kazakhstan 40.8% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland was 43.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 43.8% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.7% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group