Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 39.1% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Costa Rica, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 39.1% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2022.
The figure is up 2.8% on the previous year and up 57.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Costa Rica peaked at 42.0% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 24.8%, in 2012.
That places Costa Rica 7th out of 34 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 37.5% | — |
| 2010 | 33.6% | -10.5% |
| 2011 | 30.6% | -8.9% |
| 2012 | 24.8% | -18.8% |
| 2014 | 31.2% | +25.6% |
| 2015 | 34.2% | +9.6% |
| 2016 | 36.5% | +6.7% |
| 2017 | 35.2% | -3.4% |
| 2018 | 35.4% | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 38.2% | +7.8% |
| 2020 | 42.0% | +9.8% |
| 2021 | 38.0% | -9.4% |
| 2022 | 39.1% | +2.8% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 39.1% is below the median for high income countries, which is 40.4%, 97% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 39.1% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 33.9%, 1.2× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5% | 37.5% | 37.5% | 1 |
| 2010s | 33.3% | 24.8% | 38.2% | 9 |
| 2020s | 39.7% | 38.0% | 42.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More work & labour data for Costa Rica
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.9965 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.9952 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.9977 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,205 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 569.35 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,908 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,868 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,776 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Costa Rica?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Costa Rica was 39.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 42.0% in 2020.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 24.8% in 2012.
- How does Costa Rica rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Costa Rica ranks 7th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 57.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group