Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Kosovo

Kosovo: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 12.4% in 2017. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2017)
12.4%
World rank
6th
of 35 countries
All-time high
28.1%
in 2006
All-time low
4.6%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Kosovo, 2006–2017

510152025302006201120172006: 28.12011: 13.12012: 6.92013: 4.62017: 12.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Kosovo recorded 12.4% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2017.

That represents a change of down 56.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Kosovo peaked at 28.1% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 4.6%, in 2013.

That places Kosovo 6th out of 35 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance in Kosovo, 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 28.1%
2011 13.1% -53.4%
2012 6.9% -47.3%
2013 4.6% -33.2%
2017 12.4% +168.0%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 12.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 10.3%, 1.2× the median. (12 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 12.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.7%, 2.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.1% 28.1% 28.1% 1
2010s 9.2% 4.6% 13.1% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 3 Chile 12.6% compare
  2. 4 Kazakhstan 12.6% compare
  3. 5 Serbia 12.5% compare
  4. 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 12.4% compare
  5. 8 Brazil 12.2% compare
  6. 9 Kyrgyzstan 11.9% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Kosovo?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Kosovo was 12.4% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 28.1% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 4.6% in 2013.
How does Kosovo rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
Kosovo ranks 6th out of 35 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is down 56.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-social-assistance/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-all-social-assistance/kosovo/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 347 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group