Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 24.0% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 24.0% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2021. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is up 4.7% on the previous year and up 94.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia peaked at 24.0% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 11.5%, in 2013.
Georgia ranks 2nd of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 12.3% | — |
| 2012 | 12.7% | +3.0% |
| 2013 | 11.5% | -8.9% |
| 2014 | 15.3% | +32.7% |
| 2015 | 14.3% | -6.7% |
| 2016 | 18.6% | +30.5% |
| 2017 | 15.2% | -18.6% |
| 2018 | 14.9% | -2.0% |
| 2019 | 17.8% | +19.9% |
| 2020 | 22.9% | +28.4% |
| 2021 | 24.0% | +4.7% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 24.0% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 10.2%, 2.4× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 24.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4.9%, 4.9× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.7% | 11.5% | 18.6% | 9 |
| 2020s | 23.4% | 22.9% | 24.0% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 1 Armenia 25.2% compare
- 3 Kyrgyzstan 12.9% compare
- 4 Kosovo 12.4% compare
- 4 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 12.4% compare
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia was 24.0% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 24.0% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.5% in 2013.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Georgia ranks 2nd out of 34 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 94.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group