Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 7.1% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Ecuador is 7.1%, measured in 2022. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.
The figure is up 38.7% on the previous year and up 150.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Ecuador peaked at 7.1% in 2022 and was at its lowest, 2.8%, in 2012.
Ecuador ranks 14th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 3.8% | — |
| 2010 | 4.7% | +22.6% |
| 2011 | 3.2% | -32.5% |
| 2012 | 2.8% | -10.5% |
| 2014 | 4.5% | +59.0% |
| 2015 | 3.7% | -18.9% |
| 2016 | 4.2% | +13.1% |
| 2017 | 4.3% | +3.3% |
| 2018 | 5.0% | +16.7% |
| 2019 | 5.6% | +12.7% |
| 2020 | 5.9% | +5.5% |
| 2021 | 5.1% | -13.5% |
| 2022 | 7.1% | +38.7% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 7.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4.9%, 1.5× the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 7.1% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.6%, 2.7× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 1 |
| 2010s | 4.2% | 2.8% | 5.6% | 9 |
| 2020s | 6.1% | 5.1% | 7.1% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Ecuador was 7.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 7.1% in 2022.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.8% in 2012.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Ecuador ranks 14th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 150.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group