Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 11.5% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland stood at 11.5%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 82.8% on the previous year and up 240.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 11.5% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 3.2%, in 2012.
That places Poland 10th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.8% | — |
| 2006 | 4.1% | +7.6% |
| 2007 | 4.1% | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5% | -15.3% |
| 2009 | 3.4% | -3.5% |
| 2010 | 3.4% | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 3.6% | +3.4% |
| 2012 | 3.2% | -10.3% |
| 2015 | 4.9% | +53.9% |
| 2016 | 5.6% | +14.6% |
| 2017 | 6.3% | +11.7% |
| 2019 | 11.5% | +82.8% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 11.5% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.6%, 100% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 11.5% is above the median for high income countries, which is 8.9%, 1.3× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 5 |
| 2010s | 5.5% | 3.2% | 11.5% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 8 Serbia 13.0% compare
- 9 Kyrgyzstan 11.6% compare
- 11 Romania 10.7% compare
- 12 Republic of Moldova 9.7% compare
- 13 Mexico 8.1% compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Poland was 11.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 11.5% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.2% in 2012.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 10th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 240.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group