Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Paraguay
Paraguay: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 3.4% in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Paraguay, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Paraguay recorded 3.4% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.6% on the previous year and down 56.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Paraguay peaked at 16.2% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3.3%, in 2020.
Paraguay ranks 27th of 34 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 16.2% | — |
| 2009 | 10.3% | -36.5% |
| 2010 | 4.4% | -57.7% |
| 2011 | 6.5% | +47.9% |
| 2012 | 7.8% | +20.7% |
| 2013 | 15.1% | +94.5% |
| 2014 | 9.6% | -36.9% |
| 2015 | 9.5% | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 9.9% | +4.5% |
| 2017 | 9.7% | -2.4% |
| 2018 | 3.4% | -64.7% |
| 2019 | 3.6% | +4.0% |
| 2020 | 3.3% | -6.0% |
| 2021 | 3.6% | +8.4% |
| 2022 | 3.4% | -5.6% |
Paraguay compared with similar countries
- Paraguay's 3.4% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 6.0%, 56% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Paraguay's 3.4% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 4.2%, 81% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 10.3% | 16.2% | 2 |
| 2010s | 7.9% | 3.4% | 15.1% | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.5% | 3.3% | 3.6% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
More work & labour data for Paraguay
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.23 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.2175 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.2425 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.2 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.9753 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 6,607 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,290 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 4,534 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 4,514 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 9,048 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Paraguay?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Paraguay was 3.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 16.2% in 2008.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.3% in 2020.
- How does Paraguay rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Paraguay ranks 27th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 56.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group