Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 29.9% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia stood at 29.9%. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.0% on the previous year and up 67.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia peaked at 29.9% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 17.9%, in 2011.
That places Georgia 1st out of 34 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 17.9% | — |
| 2012 | 18.4% | +3.0% |
| 2013 | 21.4% | +16.1% |
| 2014 | 24.8% | +16.0% |
| 2015 | 23.3% | -6.0% |
| 2016 | 24.2% | +3.7% |
| 2017 | 23.0% | -4.6% |
| 2018 | 22.6% | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 23.2% | +2.6% |
| 2020 | 29.1% | +25.4% |
| 2021 | 29.9% | +3.0% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 29.9% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.6%, 2.6× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 29.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 6.0%, 5.0× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.1% | 17.9% | 24.8% | 9 |
| 2020s | 29.5% | 29.1% | 29.9% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia was 29.9% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 29.9% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.9% in 2011.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Georgia ranks 1st out of 34 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 67.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group