Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 17.6% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 17.6% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in 2021. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is up 1.2% on the previous year and up 61.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia peaked at 17.6% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 10.9%, in 2011.
That places Georgia 1st out of 35 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Georgia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 10.9% | — |
| 2012 | 11.2% | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 10.9% | -2.7% |
| 2014 | 13.5% | +23.8% |
| 2015 | 12.5% | -7.3% |
| 2016 | 15.5% | +23.3% |
| 2017 | 13.2% | -14.7% |
| 2018 | 12.9% | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 14.1% | +9.1% |
| 2020 | 17.3% | +22.7% |
| 2021 | 17.6% | +1.2% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 17.6% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 7.7%, 2.3× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 17.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.8%, 4.7× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.8% | 10.9% | 15.5% | 9 |
| 2020s | 17.4% | 17.3% | 17.6% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 2 Kosovo 11.9% compare
- 2 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 11.9% compare
- 4 Kyrgyzstan 9.7% compare
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Georgia was 17.6% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 17.6% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.9% in 2011.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Georgia ranks 1st out of 35 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 61.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group