Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social was 4.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus is 4.7%, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of up 11.0% on the previous year and up 44.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 7.8% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 2.5%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 14th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2.5% | — |
| 2009 | 3.3% | +28.0% |
| 2010 | 2.9% | -10.6% |
| 2012 | 3.4% | +15.9% |
| 2013 | 4.7% | +38.2% |
| 2014 | 5.1% | +9.1% |
| 2015 | 5.5% | +7.9% |
| 2016 | 7.8% | +42.2% |
| 2017 | 4.3% | -44.9% |
| 2018 | 4.2% | -1.8% |
| 2019 | 4.7% | +11.0% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 4.7% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 7.7%, 61% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 4.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.8%, 1.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9% | 2.5% | 3.3% | 2 |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 2.9% | 7.8% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 4.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 7.8% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 14th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group