Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 13.2% in 2021. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Georgia is 13.2%, measured in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.3% on the previous year and down 24.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Georgia peaked at 17.4% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 11.0%, in 2013.
Georgia ranks 7th of 25 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 17.4% | — |
| 2012 | 11.4% | -34.4% |
| 2013 | 11.0% | -3.9% |
| 2014 | 14.2% | +29.3% |
| 2015 | 15.8% | +11.5% |
| 2016 | 13.5% | -14.6% |
| 2017 | 13.4% | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 13.2% | -1.8% |
| 2019 | 11.8% | -10.7% |
| 2020 | 13.8% | +17.0% |
| 2021 | 13.2% | -4.3% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 13.2% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 12.8%, 1.0× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 13.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 6.4%, 2.1× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.5% | 11.0% | 17.4% | 9 |
| 2020s | 13.5% | 13.2% | 13.8% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 5 Republic of Moldova 14.9% compare
- 6 Poland 14.1% compare
- 8 Serbia 12.5% compare
- 9 Kyrgyzstan 11.3% compare
- 10 Kazakhstan 11.2% compare
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Georgia was 13.2% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 17.4% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.0% in 2013.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Georgia ranks 7th out of 25 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group