Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 19.8% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
19.8%
Change on year
up 6.9%
World rank
2nd
of 25 countries
All-time high
53.9%
in 2016
All-time low
5.7%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

10203040502008201320192008: 5.72009: 8.82010: 7.32012: 8.32013: 12.12014: 15.82015: 16.62016: 53.92017: 15.22018: 18.52019: 19.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus stood at 19.8%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.9% on the previous year and up 125.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 53.9% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 5.7%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 2nd of 25 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 5.7%
2009 8.8% +53.6%
2010 7.3% -16.7%
2012 8.3% +13.0%
2013 12.1% +47.0%
2014 15.8% +29.9%
2015 16.6% +5.0%
2016 53.9% +225.7%
2017 15.2% -71.8%
2018 18.5% +21.5%
2019 19.8% +6.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 7.2% 5.7% 8.8% 2
2010s 18.6% 7.3% 53.9% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Armenia 30.5% compare
  2. 3 Kosovo 15.5% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 15.5% compare
  4. 5 Republic of Moldova 14.9% compare

See the full ranking of 25 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 19.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 53.9% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 5.7% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 2nd out of 25 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 125.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 211 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group